<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: U-M gets an A?</title>
	<link>http://blogs.michiganreview.com/day-in-review/2008/02/23/u-m-gets-an-a/</link>
	<description>The Campus Affiars Journal at the University of Michigan</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 23:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: home security cameras</title>
		<link>http://blogs.michiganreview.com/day-in-review/2008/02/23/u-m-gets-an-a/#comment-49826</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 02:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.michiganreview.com/day-in-review/2008/02/23/u-m-gets-an-a/#comment-49826</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;security cameras...&lt;/strong&gt;

security cameras 2008...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>security cameras&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>security cameras 2008&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Adam Paul</title>
		<link>http://blogs.michiganreview.com/day-in-review/2008/02/23/u-m-gets-an-a/#comment-6269</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.michiganreview.com/day-in-review/2008/02/23/u-m-gets-an-a/#comment-6269</guid>
					<description>Brian,

I agree the rating does not give anyone a false impression of safety in Ann Arbor. The town, overall, is quite safe for students. But that truth has little to do with how Reader's Digest looked at universities. 

The kinds of variables it used and the way it analyzed them remains  shoddy. A few slight changes to this framework, like placing more weight on full-time front door workers, could have skewed the results against U-M.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian,</p>
<p>I agree the rating does not give anyone a false impression of safety in Ann Arbor. The town, overall, is quite safe for students. But that truth has little to do with how Reader&#8217;s Digest looked at universities. </p>
<p>The kinds of variables it used and the way it analyzed them remains  shoddy. A few slight changes to this framework, like placing more weight on full-time front door workers, could have skewed the results against U-M.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Brian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.michiganreview.com/day-in-review/2008/02/23/u-m-gets-an-a/#comment-6174</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 04:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.michiganreview.com/day-in-review/2008/02/23/u-m-gets-an-a/#comment-6174</guid>
					<description>The only problem is that the ranking might make people too comfortable. I doubt Ann Arbor could rank low compared to other college towns, and a simple compilation of FBI statistics would confirm that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only problem is that the ranking might make people too comfortable. I doubt Ann Arbor could rank low compared to other college towns, and a simple compilation of FBI statistics would confirm that.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
